<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview about Spellwright &amp; my Contemplations Fantastic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blakecharlton.com/2009/11/an-interview-about-spellwright-my-contemplations-fantastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blakecharlton.com/2009/11/an-interview-about-spellwright-my-contemplations-fantastic/</link>
	<description>Med Student, Novelist, Essayist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muser</title>
		<link>http://www.blakecharlton.com/2009/11/an-interview-about-spellwright-my-contemplations-fantastic/comment-page-1/#comment-19115</link>
		<dc:creator>Muser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blakecharlton.com/?p=941#comment-19115</guid>
		<description>You know, SSF is my favorite genre, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s literature. I&#039;ve taken literature courses and learned what makes fiction literary as opposed to commercial, and I just can&#039;t imagine how an SFF novel could be literature. It can make darn good commercial fiction, though (the best, IMHO). But literature is written to be literary, isn&#039;t it? And commercial fiction is written to be commercial fiction. Neither is better than the other; they&#039;re just different. And SFF belongs part of the latter category. That&#039;s not a bad thing at all. Anyway, that&#039;s just the impression I&#039;ve gotten from the literature classes I&#039;ve taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, SSF is my favorite genre, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s literature. I&#8217;ve taken literature courses and learned what makes fiction literary as opposed to commercial, and I just can&#8217;t imagine how an SFF novel could be literature. It can make darn good commercial fiction, though (the best, IMHO). But literature is written to be literary, isn&#8217;t it? And commercial fiction is written to be commercial fiction. Neither is better than the other; they&#8217;re just different. And SFF belongs part of the latter category. That&#8217;s not a bad thing at all. Anyway, that&#8217;s just the impression I&#8217;ve gotten from the literature classes I&#8217;ve taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyson Perna</title>
		<link>http://www.blakecharlton.com/2009/11/an-interview-about-spellwright-my-contemplations-fantastic/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson Perna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blakecharlton.com/?p=941#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Finally got around to reading the interview and I&#039;m glad I did.  You always have much to say, Mr. Charlton.  I&#039;m looking forward to reading Spellwright even more than I was before.

Regarding literary, excuse me Literary, acceptance of SFF, I think the genre is better off without it.  With acceptance comes writers writing for the critics, something SFF has been blessedly free of for the most part.  Writing with critics in mind equals stagnation and death.  Just look at the current state of Literature.  Steinbeck, Hemingway, and Faulkner it ain&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally got around to reading the interview and I&#8217;m glad I did.  You always have much to say, Mr. Charlton.  I&#8217;m looking forward to reading Spellwright even more than I was before.</p>
<p>Regarding literary, excuse me Literary, acceptance of SFF, I think the genre is better off without it.  With acceptance comes writers writing for the critics, something SFF has been blessedly free of for the most part.  Writing with critics in mind equals stagnation and death.  Just look at the current state of Literature.  Steinbeck, Hemingway, and Faulkner it ain&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

